Hi Mikhail
I didn't study details of net testing so I can not say for sure - I expect
that with some minor improvements the prototype can be used for most of
testing scenarios (I mean scenarios where a test opens connection and
optionally send/receive some message.)
Thanks,
Stepan.
On 5/19/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi Stepan
how far the prototype from what is desired?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/19, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 5/19/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
>
> > Hi George,
> >
> > see below
> >
> > On 5/19/06, George Harley wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Stepan,
> > >
> > > Yes, there is probably scope for adding some logic to this test
method
> > > where - in the event of no network connection we write a message to
> > > stderr and move on. An alternative is to provide for connections to
be
> > > opened up against a server on the local machine. A couple of days
ago I
> > > spent some time adding the small, lightweight (and Apache licensed)
> > > Jetty server to the LUNI tests. In my local sandbox the LUNI
> > > make/build.xml file the run.tests target was updated to start up
Jetty
> > > --> run the LUNI tests --> stop Jetty. It worked fine apart from a
> > > glitch I had getting the cgi-bin to work properly in Jetty.
Apparently
> > > this is a fairly common problem when it is used on Windows. I'm
starting
> > > to feel that it might be best to exclude the one or two cgi-bin
related
> > > tests in the LUNI tests for now in the interests of bringing Jetty
on
> > > board. It would certainly help get some more java.net tests up and
> > > running and enable this particular test case to run without the need
for
> > > a network connection. What do you think ?
> >
> >
> > I think that we should try to develop small local test server that
just
> > opens connection and optionally send/receive test message. There is a
> > prototype of such test server (see HARMONY-167) and but I didn't
integrate
> > it with tests yet.
> >
>
> Sorry, wrong JIRA number - see HARMONY-164
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > > I would, of course, float the Jetty proposal on the dev list first
to
> > > make sure we were all happy with the suggestion :-)
> >
> >
> > I'm OK only if we separate tests with Jetty from common test suite
run.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Best regards,
> > > George
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > Richard, George
> > > >
> > > > I'm not fan of tests that depend on network connection. Is it
> > > > necessary for
> > > > this test:
> > > >
> > > > + public void test_getOutputStream_afterConnection() throws
Exception
> > > {
> > > > + URLConnection uc = new
> > > > URL("http://www.apache.org ").openConnection<http://www.apache.org
> > > ").openconnection/>
> > > >
> > > > ();
> > > > + uc.setDoOutput(true);
> > > > + uc.connect();
> > > > + assertNotNull( uc.getOutputStream());
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Stepan Mishura
------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
