The difference is that access to that field should be done without
reflection. I don't have the jchevm at hand, but I think the
problematic code should look like:
interface I {
static final int field = 123;
}
class S implements I {
}
public static C extends S {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(field);
}
}
I didn't tested wether it fails. I will check it when get home.
--
Ivan
2006/6/5, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
> Btw, I have found problem is classloader in jchevm.
> Resolution of field in interface of superclass of some class fails.
> Reproducible at eclipse. I have a patch with fix. It's quite simple. I
> can send it at evening too.
Do you have a simple test case? This one seems to work OK:
public class FieldRes {
public static interface FieldResInterface {
int field = 123;
}
public static class FieldResSuperclass implements FieldResInterface {
}
public static class FieldResClass extends FieldResSuperclass {
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
FieldResClass obj = new FieldResClass();
System.out.println(obj.getClass().getField("field"));
System.out.println(obj.field);
}
}
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ivan
Intel Middleware Products Division
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
