Dalibor Topic wrote: > > As much as I appreciate people trying to get yet another discussion going, > it's all already said in the archives, so there is little need to keep > bringing up the subject on either GNU Classpath or Harmony lists. :) > > The story of opening J2EE shows that one can attract > strategic contributions that would not happen otherwise if one creates > a single project with a single goal and a single license. > > As long as Harmony keeps shaking out code that'd be left closed away > otherwise, I think it's doing fine. Having two,three implementations to work > with is much less of a problem than having none.
+1 geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
