Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> How much time?

Can I have a day to answer that question accurately ;-) ?

Regards,
Tim

> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> I'd like to request more time to look through the contribution.
>> Apologies for the delay but it is a large amount of code.  The vote came
>> round a bit quicker than the others -- which is good but unexpected.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>> I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-528, so I can assert
>>> that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
>>>
>>> Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
>>> class library :
>>>
>>> [ ] + 1 Accept
>>> [ ] -1 Reject  (provide reason below)
>>>
>>> Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need
>>> more time or b) we get all committer votes before then.
>>>
>>> Again, I think that getting this into SVN and letting people supply
>>> patches against SVN will be productive.  Also, there's a lot of
>>> excitement around getting this in and a binary snapshot created...
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to