Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > How much time? Can I have a day to answer that question accurately ;-) ?
Regards, Tim > Tim Ellison wrote: >> I'd like to request more time to look through the contribution. >> Apologies for the delay but it is a large amount of code. The vote came >> round a bit quicker than the others -- which is good but unexpected. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >>> I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-528, so I can assert >>> that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN. >>> >>> Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony >>> class library : >>> >>> [ ] + 1 Accept >>> [ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below) >>> >>> Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need >>> more time or b) we get all committer votes before then. >>> >>> Again, I think that getting this into SVN and letting people supply >>> patches against SVN will be productive. Also, there's a lot of >>> excitement around getting this in and a binary snapshot created... >>> >>> geir >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]