Tim Ellison wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >> Tim Ellison wrote: >>> Since we want to keep ARCHIVE working throughout we can create a branch >>> if you think the pack200 dev will be dangerous (I think we can handle it >>> in-place, but whatever). >> Why a branch? can it just be out of the mainline build? IOW, excluded >> for everyone else in the build? > > ARCHIVE is already in the mainline build and contains jar/zip support, > we don't want to exclude that.
That wasn't what I meant. I meant excluding the single file(s) that cause the problem. > >> (Or just make Alex keep it working :) > > That would be my preference -- the committer that applies the patch and > the continuous build can check win/linux compilation. If 'keeping it > working' is too onerous, then branch. Or get help :) geir > > Regards, > Tim > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
