Mark,
Does it make sense to add the test coverage script into the step 3), as
the tools in Harmony-564?
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 8 June 2006 at 8:01, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting. I wasn't thinking of having unit or implementation tests
in here, as those still should be "near" the subcomponent, be it VM,
classlib, etc, but larger 'end-to-end' functional tests ? I don't know
if that makes sense...
I was originally hoping that Mark would tell us what he has running
over at IBM, and let us start from there.. .:)
(Sorry, I have been distracted looking at jchevm, the classlibadapter,
and trying to grok the drlvm build system.)
We have two machines running continuum, one linux and one windows, with
a wrapper project in a local svn repository that pulls in classlib using
svn:externals. It contains an ant script that does:
1) Call the classlib ant file to build with a reference JDK.
2) Call the classlib ant file to build with IBM VME, classlib and
Eclipse (this was disabled due to jsr14 issues but could be enabled
again now I think).
3) Call the classlib ant file to Run the tests
4) Publish the results and update an index.html file.
The linux machine also has a few more steps between 3 and 4:
3a) Run JAPI tools
3b) Generate class list for the newly-built JRE and then produce a
report of the class coverage with respect to some reference applications
- the tools for this (slightly edited) are in HARMONY-565
I'd be happy to share this wrapper though it'll need a little tidying
up first.
Regards,
Mark.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]