Hello to everyone, I am currently investigating tests for java.beans module. As far as I understand there were two separate contributions of java.beans tests from two different parties. And these contributions were merged into the single combined test suite we have now in svn. As a result currently we have about 400 test case failures (excluded) out of approximately 1200. After spending some time on this I realize that we have two types of issues here:
1. Test checks the compliance with very deep detail of RI's behavior (that is not in spec). 2. Test expects the behavior that differs from the RI's behavior as well as from our implementation's behavior. As for point 1, I'm unsure here. Do we really need to be completely identical to the RI in terms of public methods behavior? Some RI decisions are strange. For point 2, I believe we should rewrite or delete such tests. Thoughts, suggestions? -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
