The current reports don't provide code source linking. Are you going to add it?
There were no information for 'security' and 'auth' modules, but, I have updated the pages and now there is source code linking for all modules. One more issue to discuss: excluded classes present in the coverage table now with 0 coverage. May be it is more convenient do not have these classes in coverage tables at all? In this case one won't wonder why the class has 0 coverage - go to exclude list to look at the class and decide whether the class is really untested or just excluded from coverage, instead, all really uncovered classes will be shown with 0 coverage, if a class is missed in coverage table – it is in exclude list. Thanks, Vladimir
Now I have 2 questions/ issues to discuss: > 1) preferable VM to calculate coverage (seems, the exclude list is a > little > bit different for j9 and drlvm) If the only difference is the exclude list then I'd suggest using VM with the shortest one. :-) 2) preferable sorting mode for results (by name, by blocks or by methods) IMHO, sorting by name looks more natural. Thanks, Stepan. Thanks, > Vladimir > > <SNIP> > ------------------------------------------------------ Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
