Tim Ellison wrote:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
So we need answers from DRLVM and jchevm guys...
Archie has expressed the jchevm opinion in favour of the change --
anyone familiar with DRLVM care to comment?
(Of course this would be after Geir's VM build work, just asking)
Regards,
Tim
DRLVM needs some (minor) changes to support 1.5-targeted classfiles,
this is quite easy. Full-fledged implementation of 1.5 kernel classes
(annotations, reflection, etc) requires some more efforts but also
should not take too long.
Understood, I wasn't expecting those to be working -- just the effort to
let DRLVM grok the v49 files.
So +1 from me.
Well it isn't a formal vote, but glad to see you are in favor too.
Regards,
Tim
Seems everyone is glad to move to 1.5, so I'd like to know when will
Harmony reach this milestone? I can hardly wait :)
--
Best Regards!
Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
