I was thinking we may as well leave the version number the same, since
we don't want to keep the previous v3 hanging around anyway. Ive
overwritten the old package on the download site so noone should
ever get it again. I'm guessing that, since you are the first person
to complain of this, there aren't many others, if any, who have
downloaded the old v3, so simply replacing the v3 package shouldn't
cause much confusion.
Hopefully it will be superseded by a 5.0 v4 in the not too distant
future anyway :)
Please let me know if you have any other problems (in fact, could
you also let me know if you have no problems :) )
Thanks,
Oliver
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Excellent - do you think it's worthwhile goosing the version to v4?
geir
(testing an IMAP account - dont' respond to this email address
directly...)
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got my ubuntu box setup, and when running the test suite, I
see
this :
[junit] Exception in thread "main"
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org.apache.harmony.luni.www.protocol.jar.JarURLConnection
This package was renamed a while back. It's now
org.apache.harmony.luni.internal.net.www.protocol.jar.JarURLConnection
(!), and the
latest J9 VME kernels have those changes reflected in their code,
which
leads me to
think that you might have an old version of the kernel classes.
Could you tell me if in your jre/bin/default directory there is a
single
kernel.jar
or two jars, luni-kernel.jar and security-kernel.jar?
two.
This is a brand new machine (it was an T42 running windows until about
4pm yesterday), and it got v3 of the j9 vm yesterday... do I don't
think
I "crossed the beams" - this is the only j9vm it's ever had.
Right, think Ive found the cause - looks like I mistakenly included a
version of com.ibm.oti.vm.VM.class
in the kernel on Linux that had that old package name in (don't ask
me how - must have been a friday
afternoon :( )
I have replaced the VME v3 for Linux on DeveloperWorks with a one
that contains the updated kernel.
Please try this one and let me know how you get on - sorry for the
hassle caused.
Doesn't anyone else see this?
I guess everyone else was still using the v2 and just moved the files
over - v2 had the correct
package names in. Also, the Windows v3 contains the right package
references.
Thanks for finding this!
Regards,
Oliver
(thx)
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Oliver Deakin
IBM United Kingdom Limited
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
