Nikolay Kuznetsov wrote:
Unfortunately, I can provide some test cases to demonstrate other
constructs, such as X{n}, DO support supplementary characters. But I'm
not sure if other constructs need special processing.
OK, I see, I'll provide general support for supplementary characters,
instead of patching some special functionality like character classes,
thanks for the clue.
And if you'll update regex unit tests with test cases that would be
great.
BTW, what's DO?
Hi Nik,
I just want to emphasize other constructs also should support
supplementary characters. I'm sorry if the "DO" make you confused, you
know, I still cannot use English smoothly ;-)
Richard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Richard Liang
China Software Development Lab, IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
