--- Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matt, this sounds great to me. Thanks! I look > forward to the JIRAs. > > I had a couple of things I was still thinking I'd > change (descriptions > in the top-level and module build.xml files was one > of them). I was > also wondering if it was better to use imports for > the make/build-*.xml > files since these are not supposed to be called > directly any more. >
If these could be changed to imports, yes, that would be better than <ant> invocations, for similar reasons as to why macros are better than <antcall>s. -Matt > Aside: Does anyone still call these > [make/build-*.xml] directly? If so, > perhaps we need more top-level targets. > > I'm quite busy anyway so I'll hold off on my changes > until you've had a > good look at them. > > Regards, > Mark. > > > > On 29 June 2006 at 8:56, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now that I've (finally, thanks Gregory!) got the > > classlib built I'd like to start playing with the > Ant > > buildfiles to apply some of the practices > encouraged > > with modern Ant versions, but possibly > lesser-known to > > old-school (aka "learned Ant 1.5.x or earlier") > users. [SNIP] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]