--- Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Matt, this sounds great to me.  Thanks!  I look
> forward to the JIRAs.
> 
> I had a couple of things I was still thinking I'd
> change (descriptions
> in the top-level and module build.xml files was one
> of them).  I was
> also wondering if it was better to use imports for
> the make/build-*.xml
> files since these are not supposed to be called
> directly any more.
> 

If these could be changed to imports, yes, that would
be better than <ant> invocations, for similar reasons
as to why macros are better than <antcall>s.

-Matt

> Aside: Does anyone still call these
> [make/build-*.xml] directly?  If so,
> perhaps we need more top-level targets.
> 
> I'm quite busy anyway so I'll hold off on my changes
> until you've had a
> good look at them.
> 
> Regards,
>  Mark.
> 
> 
> 
> On 29 June 2006 at 8:56, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now that I've (finally, thanks Gregory!) got the
> > classlib built I'd like to start playing with the
> Ant
> > buildfiles to apply some of the practices
> encouraged
> > with modern Ant versions, but possibly
> lesser-known to
> > old-school (aka "learned Ant 1.5.x or earlier")
> users.
[SNIP]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to