Hi, 
I didn't find any bugs in gc_v4 at the moment,
but this feature is really very useful especially if
you modify gc_v4 or design a new gc. Of course, it needs to 
be improved and developed.

Also I'm going to add feature to verify write barriers work. 
The same way as in GC heap verification I use idea to
hijack interface function concerning write barriers.

This patch will be sent a bit later.

Pleased to hear from you, Vera :)!
 
-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 9:37 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DRLVM] GC heap verification infrastructure

On the 0x1A6 day of Apache Harmony Vera Volynets wrote:
> *************   GC heap verification infrastructure   *************** 
> Hi,
> I have been working on implementing GC heap verification
infrastructure
> for Stop-The-World GC in DRLVM.
> This infrastructure is intended be used with any stop-the-world GC
> implementation, conforming to the GC-VM interface (described in gc.h
and
> vm_gc.h), with only a minor GC-VM interface change. 
> It works on Windows and Linux ia32 platforms.

cool feature! did you find any bugs in DRLVM while testing?
do you have plans/ideas for future development of the tool?

> [...]
>  
> *Patch contents*
> This is an individual contribution, and it was prepared according to
the
> requirements of Apache cleanroom process; the size of two files all in
> all is about 30kb (161 and 585 lines). 
> -Patch Add-function-to-gc-interface.txt

oh, I found it! HARMONY-881 

-- 
Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to