Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2006/7/18, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> > Guys, >> > >> > There is a CORBA implementation in Apache incubator named Yoko. >> > http://incubator.apache.org/yoko/ >> > >> > I've built and reviewed it... It seems that Yoko have almost all the >> > packages from the 1.5 specification. >> > So it looks like a good candidate for using as CORBA for Harmony. >> Great. Does it come with a test suite too? Just thinking about how we >> check that the Yoko code works ok on Harmony. > Yep, it has test suite but I was not successful in trying to run it yet :( > >> > The only problem is that Yoko has even more packages in org.omg then >> > specified by 1.5 specification. So we should decide what to do with >> > them. >> Hmm, is that a problem? I'm assuming that we can have any packages >> outside the 1.5 spec that we want (e.g. o.a.harmony.whatever). > org.apache.harmony is our internal classes.
Understood. > But Yoko has additional packages under org.omg which are covered by > 1.5 spec. This is the bit I don't get -- if they are packages not in the 1.5 spec then why do you say they are 'covered by the 1.5 spec'? > In fact it looks like additional packages like java.smth or > javax.swing.smth in Harmony. No, Sun have no call over the org.omg package namespace. I agree it would be wrong to have additional java.* packages, but I'd be very surprised if having additional org.omg packages was 'illegal'. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
