Geir Magnusson Jr 写道:
Can we get Java 5 done first? ;)
geir
Yes, of course. :-)
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
BTW there are a lot of other RFEs:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement.
Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony as
JDK
extentions: struct/hotcode replacement/ftp support/logging support with
ability to remove it from code like 'assert' keyword..
On 7/23/06, shen yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, AFAIK, SUN still does not support DTD 4.01 in JAVA 6.Refer to [1]
May be they will wait for JAVA 7. And many
developers are calling for DTD 4.01 support. IMO, it's a good idea to
support DTD 4.01 in our project.
Best regards
[1]http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/api/
2006/7/22, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Which one should we follow? ¿Both? The parser behavior is
parameterized
by
a DTD, so perhaps we should provide a 3.2 DTD, to be compatible with
Sun,
and a 4.01 DTD.
Any ideas?
Miguel Montes
This RFE is about 7 years old and AFAIK SUN does not want to fix it in
the
nearest feature:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4296022
Miguel, your proposal to support both versions sounds very reasonable.
This
way we can move a progress and to have influence on Java.
--
Mikhail Fursov
--
Spark Shen
China Software Development Lab, IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Spark Shen
China Software Development Lab, IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
