On 7/25/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you honour the existing table layout then you don't need to break
compatibility. In addition, VMs are not required to use the class
library portlib if they choose not to.
I don't know the way IBM VME uses the portlibrary, but concerning the DRLVM
(vm/vmi/src/vmi.cpp), the DRLVM needs recompilation if the HyPortLibrary
structure changes as Paulex described.
But it's ok since
>Harmony has its own vm and nobody uses j9 vm binaries.
This is a joke right? There are three VMs in various states of
development at Harmony, and people are also using the IBM VME.
As the official Apache Harmony site doesn't have the link to IBM VME, I
thought people are not using it.
And about IBM VME, are there any plans to publish the binaries for 64-bit
platforms?
Thanks, Marina
