> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 3:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [rant] Memory options in VM -- why is the 
> default not 'unlimited'
> 
> On Tuesday 01 August 2006 18:07, will pugh wrote:
> > How did Kaffe deal with SoftReferences?  Did they ever go 
> away when you
> > did not have a memory limit?
> 
> Why are we discussing Kaffe in the past tense?

I assume because the resolution of the issue happened in the past?

geir

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to