Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > Tim Ellison wrote: >> Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be >> usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1]. >> > > We need to make sure that DRLVM is ready first, although looking at the > the patch, I'm not sure there's much to be done.
Right, that's why I put out the call. > Worrysome, given the boot classpath property. > > I am in the process of running for a plane. (There's news...) Can > someone verify that there will be no problem w/ DRLVM before we do this? > > >> Can other VM folk let me know if/when they are comfortable with that >> patch being applied? The contents were described by Oliver, and the >> patch file is short enough to read. >> >> The only potential breakages I see for you are the renaming of a system >> property, and the launcher looking for a different DLL name. > > Right - that was my worry, the system property, but I didn't find that > on first pass. > > The launcher change is irrelevant for now, since there are other issues > that need to be fixed w/ DRLVM before it works properly w/ the launcher, > where "properly" is defined as "having all the DRLVM artifacts in a > /default or other subdirectory of jre/bin" :) Yep. Just want to ensure the *current* VM states are not regressed by applying the patch -- we all agree there is more work to be done. Regards, Tim > geir > >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> [1] http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony/index.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
