Oh - definitely only add as needed, and yes, we need to have good documentation to assist users.
And I'm very +1 about including this by default for now. See other threads as for why. geir Alex Blewitt wrote: > Sounds like a FAQ in the making :-) > > On 10/08/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Alex Blewitt wrote: >> > OK. What's the plan with regards to adding items in here e.g. Base64 >> > or tools like JavaC? Or do we just add them organically as we find >> > problems? >> >> Let's try and keep this JAR as small as possible, only adding types >> after a debate on the list concludes that it is a 'necessity'. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> -- >> >> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> IBM Java technology centre, UK. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
