On 8/16/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
You've probably meant x-net, because IIRC 'security' was relayout before these conversations started x-net layout could have changed after some conversations started, but after that all the modules weren't changed I believe
Yes, that's true. As result of this discussion: can we agree on not changing tests layout until we reach an agreement on using TestNG? (Or at least discuss it here before doing). Thanks, Stepan. Thanks,
Mikhail 2006/8/16, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:41 PM > > > > On Aug 14, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote: > > > > > > > > I was waiting for a conclusion to come to the testing layout, but > > > nothing > > > has happened so far and I wanted to move ahead with cleaning up the > > > mess > > > that is currently the test case. As such, I decided to move forward > > > with > > > some of the testing proposal (the package naming convention) and > > > just keep > > > the folder layout simple by having just one folder. This greatly > > > simplified > > > the code layout as well as the build script. > > > > I think you should try to get some consensus on this, even as just a > > temporary step. > > We've had dozens of conversations about the directory layout for tests, > specifically about using folders like "src/test/api" and "src/test/impl" > (both for and against) and I have yet to see any consensus there, but this > hasn't stopped the 'security' module from being completely refactored to > follow this layout. > > > > > > > > > When an actual test scheme is finalized, we can move the tests to > > > whatever > > > folder is appropriate. SVN handles file and folder moves extremely > > > well and > > > tracks every change with ease. > > > > > > Right now, what I'm trying to do is: > > > * Consolidate all LUNI tests into "org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.** ". > > > * Get as many LUNI tests as possible to run on an RI JRE. Those > > > that are > > > specific implementation tests will be segregated. I'd say we'd be > > > lucky if > > > 50% of the tests that are API tests actually pass on an RI JRE. > > > > Anyone disagree with point 1? > > > > geir > >
-- Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division ------------------------------------------------------ Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
