Hi Mikhail, I think your suggestion below will work. I will try it hopefully in the next few weeks. Thanks
On 8/21/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Weldon, I saw Alex 2 or 3 days ago and he told me that he will travel a lot for 2 weeks and will have a problems with access to the computer with Internet. Anyway I think I can help you with the problem you have. DRLVM already has a mechanism to filter methods between different execution engines (JITs) by method names: Execution Manager's filters. So the easiest way to call different object allocation helpers for different methods is to build 2 jitrino.dll's. The first JIT library should keep the old helper call and the second one should be patched to call a new helper. After you have 2 libraries you can configure EM http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/drlvm/emguide.html which library(JIT version) to use to compile a method using method name filters. Is this solution solves your problem? On 8/15/06, Weldon Washburn < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alex, > > How hard would it be to modify Jitrino.JET to call a different object > allocation helper function on a method-by-method basis? This would > help a bunch with integrating MMTk into DRLVM. It would also be nice > to enable write barriers on a method-by-method basis. > > Thanks > -- > Weldon Washburn > Intel Middleware Products Division > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Mikhail Fursov
-- Weldon Washburn Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
