I agree, I think it is a good idea, since changes can still be made, code
will be on the archive, and we do not confuse people with multiple rmi
versions
within the classlib.
Daniel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Beyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 9:51 PM
Subject: RE: [classlib][rmi] DISCUSSION : Use the RMI modiule and move the
others to archive
I like this approach. Anyone that wants to integrate changes can just
submit
patches.
-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [classlib][rmi] DISCUSSION : Use the RMI modiule and move the
others to archive
We've had multiple RMI modules hanging around for a while due to our
fortune of multiple submissions.
Would anyone have a problem if we 'retired' all except modules/rmi to
the archive, and then took whatever was needed from there?
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
