On 30 August 2006 at 14:02, "Sergey Soldatov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually all these rejects were integrated during Swing text > integration and they doesn't matter.
Ok, but it would still be more reassuring to have a clean patch. Currently, the only way I'd be confident that the patch has been consistently applied would be to check the rejects by hand. I'm assuming those who create the patch could do this quicker than any of committers. -Mark. > On 8/30/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > However, I'd also like to hear the end of the dependency saga. > > > > It would also be useful (when the vote is complete) to have an up to > > date patch. The current patch has lots of rejects due to "previously > > applied" hunks, etc. It will be quite difficult to integrate in its > > current state. > > > > Regards, > > Mark. > > > > On 28 August 2006 at 1:50, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1225 wrt BCC and ACQ. > > > > > > Please vote to accept or reject this set of patches and fixes into the > > > Apache Harmony class library : > > > > > > [ ] + 1 Accept > > > [ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below) > > > > > > Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need > > > more time or b) we get all committer votes before then. > > > > > > geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
