yep -- that's what I meant. The on-line doc should be generated from the code comments as it is today.
Regards, Tim Morozova, Nadezhda wrote: > As I got it, the referenced documentation is created from code already, > so I don't quite get Geir's comment ;( > Anyway, I agree that keeping docs up-to-date is important. Do you think > we can ask the community to update comments with the code changes? This > way, the docs will never be out-of-sync. And those reading the code will > have a better understanding of what it does. > > Best regards, > Nadya Morozova > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:36 PM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [classlib][luni] Put setInterruptAction() in our j.l.Thread > stub? > > true, but there's no reason why this couldn't be in the code too... > > geir > > Tim Ellison wrote: >> Our VM interface documentation[1] is drifting out of sync with code >> changes. If anyone has time to refresh it, with help from the dev > list, >> that would be a very valuable task. We should ensure that VM writers >> understand how to get the harmony class library code working with > their VM. >> [1] amongst others, >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/d > oc/kernel_doc/html/index.html?view=co >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> Oliver Deakin wrote: >>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>> This came up in another thread. >>>> >>>> Currently, java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel > depends >>>> on there being a setInterruptAction() method on java.lang.Thread. >>>> >>>> I certainly think that this kind of thing should be documented, so > the >>>> question - should we add this to our Thread stub class? >>> Yes we should - I didn't realise initially that this method was being >>> used (since it was private). >>> Now we know it's in use in AbstractInterruptibleChannel, we'd better > put >>> some doc in for future >>> kernel writers. Can someone just bring back the original comments and >>> method stub that was >>> there? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Oliver >>> >>>> geir >>>> >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
