On 9/15/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Ilya,

Just to make sure. Yesterday I have added a new method to the
PropertyDescriptor class from the beans module. It contains two new
exception messages so I just took next two ids "beans.47" and
"beans.48". Does this fit to the new scheme? I hope you are not going
to renumber ids after renaming keys for console messages...


Hello, Alexei!

Of course there is no need to renumber ids, it will definitely take too much
time and I think it's senseless.
You can add new messages as you suggested for beans changes.
In general, IMO it would be right to leave empty string instead of renamed
keys. Thus in the future it will be easy to see which keys are skipped in
the enumeration to add new messages with these ids.

Regards,
Ilya.

Thanks,

2006/9/13, Ilya Okomin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Agree, we should follow the conventions we've reached.
> For future updates I'll add the convention to the HARMONY-1308 comments,
> where the way to internationalize messages is described.
> As for already processed modules, I've found only few error strings and
> console messages in beans, auth, security, instrument and logging
> modules. Thus we can leave it as is now for these modules and do it
later in
> lazy way.
> Messages naming convention is seems to me more important for modules
with a
> huge number of messages of different types, such as x-net and rmi. These
> modules have not been internationalized yet.
>
> Regards,
> Ilya.
>
> On 9/13/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I believe it could be done in lazy way...
> > But it defenetly should be done.
> >
> > SY, Alexey
> >
> > 2006/9/13, Oleg Khaschansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Are there any non-exception messages in the other modules which are
> > > already internationalized? I think, if there are any, they should be
> > > modified to follow the new convention.
> > >
> > > --
> > >  Oleg
> > >
> > > On 9/12/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
> > > > > > 2. add a prefix to the String name, for an example,
rmi.console.1,
> > > > > > rmi.errormsg.2. it can be more detail.
> > > >
> > > > Ilya Okomin wrote:
> > > > > The way to use prefixes in the keys names to separate messages
of
> > one type
> > > > > from another looks to me pretty convenient
> > > >
> > > > Nice idea guys, +1 from me
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > 2006/9/11, Ilya Okomin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > Thanks all for useful comments!
> > > > >
> > > > > The way to use prefixes in the keys names to separate messages
of
> > one type
> > > > > from another looks to me pretty convenient. If there are no
> > objections I
> > > > > would use default key names "<module>.<id>" for exception
messages,
> > and
> > > > > <module>.<prefix>.<id>  for certain messages where <prefix> is
"log"
> > or
> > > > > "console" (or any other key word depending on the purpose).
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ilya.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/11/06, Jimmy, Jing Lv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ilya Okomin wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > During rmi module internationalization I've faced with loads
of
> > log
> > > > > > > messages
> > > > > > > (e.g. take a look at o.a.h.rmi.DefaultRMIClassLoaderSpi).
> > > > > > > Also some classes (e.g. o.a.h.rmi.compiler.RmicStrings) have
> > strings
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > are the usage texts of any console tool.
> > > > > > > I think we shouldn't internationalize such messages, however
I'm
> > not
> > > > > > really
> > > > > > > sure about that.
> > > > > > > If we internationalize them - we'll obtain fully
> > internationalized
> > > > > > module
> > > > > > > it is an advantage.
> > > > > > >> From the other hand - if you have to analyse someone's log,
it
> > is
> > > > > > >> useful if
> > > > > > > the common langauge was used. Moreover, messages.propertiesfile
> > with
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > list of all messages will be too huge to find appropriate
> > messages for
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > classes developed later.
> > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IMHO, we have agree on that all console output can be
> > internationalized.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If the only problem of a too huge messages.properties file is
to
> > find
> > > > > > appropriate, I guess we can:
> > > > > > 1. Separate the file into several smaller ones, one for
console,
> > one for
> > > > > > error message, etc. Or
> > > > > > 2. add a prefix to the String name, for an example,
rmi.console.1,
> > > > > > rmi.errormsg.2. it can be more detail.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In this way we can find some certain message easy. And I
prefer 2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jimmy, Jing Lv
> > > > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ilya Okomin
> > > > > Intel Middleware Products Division
> > > > --
> > > > Alexei Zakharov,
> > > > Intel Middleware Product Division
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexey A. Petrenko
> > Intel Middleware Products Division
> >
> --
> --
> Ilya Okomin
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
>


--
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel Middleware Product Division

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
--
Ilya Okomin
Intel Middleware Products Division

Reply via email to