Thanks for explaining. This is another variant of the bytecode-based regression tests.
-Pavel On 15 Sep 2006 17:53:00 +0700, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the 0x1E5 day of Apache Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote: > Egor, > > How Nullstone tests differ from what Rana proposed and Mikhail L. prototyped > - could you please elaborate? the idea is simple. You have two versions of a test. First -- unoptimized, second -- same algorithm, but optimized by hand with a specific optimization. If the times of execution differ much, then, the optimization is not done properly in the checked compiler. It works best with optimizations that are easy to represent in a high-level language (i.e. Java), such as "load hoisting", "loop unrolling", etc. see http://www.nullstone.com for more info -- Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
