On 24 September 2006 at 14:29, "Nathan Beyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * I think we should utilize the Accessor classes in 'misc' (in place > of Objects), but I think these all need to be refactored into a kernel > or VM module. I really don't like the 'misc' naming, as it make it > seem like it's just some extra crap that doesn't fit in any category, > which seems very inappropriate as these are core VM services and > utilities used by many modules.
I'd always assumed we'd merge misc (which I integrated from the awt/swing contribution) in to the luni module. I probably mentioned it when I did the integration (since it was part of my justification for converting the misc natives from C++ to C.) Currently, they are VM-independent so I'd say they should say in a classlib module. -Mark. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]