28 Sep 2006 17:50:57 +0700, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On the 0x1F2 day of Apache Harmony Elena Semukhina wrote:
> On 9/28/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Apparently there are some threading issues, which affect almost all
> > suites (except may be smoke tests). I observe quite many sporadic
> > crashes in c-unit, kernel and classlib tests. For example, the
> > following assert fails often:
> > drlvm/vm/thread/src/thread_native_suspend.c:351:
> > hythread_set_safepoint_callback: Assertion `status == (0)' failed.
> > Another incomprehensible error is described in HARMONY-1614.
> > These defects most probably point to races in TM or VM internals, and
> > are hard enough to insulate and root-cause.
> >
> > Aside from that, there are "known" stable failures, like kernel
> > ThreadTest and ClassLoaderTest, or classlib's
>
>
> ThreadTest is a kind of "always failing test" unfortunately. Now its failure
> is related to launcher related issue mentioned in another thread as well as
> the HARMONY-1537 issue. All these issues are fixed with HARMONY-1582 patch.
> On the other hand, HARMONY-1582 reports that ThreadTest fails showing up new
> problems possibly related to H-1519 patch. So ThreadTest is very helpful in
> catching regressions and should be paid a special attention to each time it
> fails :)
>
> As for general statistics of kernel test failures, ThreadTest fails now on
> all platforms in all modes (jet, opt, int) and ClassLoaderTest and
> ClassAnnotationTest fail on opt (win, linux), which is under Egor's
> investigation.

ClassLoaderTest, to be precise..
ClassAnnotatationsTest passes for me on linux

It crashes sometimes (not very often) on OPT with the same trace as
ClassLoaderTest which actually tells nothing...


> Thanks,
> Elena
>
> org.apache.harmony.archive.tests.java.util.jar.JarOutputStreamTest and
> > org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.ThreadGroupTest. These are
> > good candidates to fix first - especially Thread related - maybe this
> > would help to get closer to more subtle defects.
> >
> >
> > 28 Sep 2006 14:47:27 +0700, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On the 0x1F2 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
> > > > Right now, we have lots of tests that are skipped in smoke tests, and
> > > > some that fail in kernel, and I believe that we're still failing the
> > > > classlib test suite.
> > > >
> > > > We should drive this to goodness and health.  How shall we start?  :)
> > >
> > > I am working on the ClassLoaderTest :)
> > > "memopt" optimization pass makes it fail, it even removes some
> > > array-bounds-checks (surprize, surprize), which looks like, ehm,
> > > unfair. For now I could not reduce the test to a small one. On small
> > > pieces of code "memopt" works less dangerously.
> > >
> > > Disabling "memopt" helps, but that would drop performance down. You
> > > can disable it temporarily if stability is very critical. Just edit
> > > the opt.emconf file (and server.emconf, etc.)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Elena

--
Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to