Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
As we know the current IBM VM does not support all 'standard' java options.
IBM VM peoples, could you give some expectation when this support will be
available (1 month, 3 or 6 ...)?
Why do we as the Harmony project care?
geir
thanks, Vladimir
The standard options from my point of view are (without deprecated):
tmp>java
Usage: java [-options] class [args...]
(to execute a class)
or java [-options] -jar jarfile [args...]
(to execute a jar file)
where options include:
-client to select the "client" VM
-server to select the "server" VM
-hotspot is a synonym for the "client" VM [deprecated]
The default VM is client.
-cp <class search path of directories and zip/jar files>
-classpath <class search path of directories and zip/jar files>
A ; separated list of directories, JAR archives,
and ZIP archives to search for class files.
-D<name>=<value>
set a system property
-verbose[:class|gc|jni]
enable verbose output
-version print product version and exit
-version:<value>
require the specified version to run
-showversion print product version and continue
-jre-restrict-search | -jre-no-restrict-search
include/exclude user private JREs in the version search
-? -help print this help message
-X print help on non-standard options
-ea[:<packagename>...|:<classname>]
-enableassertions[:<packagename>...|:<classname>]
enable assertions
-da[:<packagename>...|:<classname>]
-disableassertions[:<packagename>...|:<classname>]
disable assertions
-esa | -enablesystemassertions
enable system assertions
-dsa | -disablesystemassertions
disable system assertions
On 9/4/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
> Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
>
>> 1. Fix the DRLVM layout - rename vmcore to "harmonyvm" and move
>> ..dll/.so into the "default" subdirectory such that one doesn't
have to
>> type -vm and -vmdir options;
>>
>
> While would you want to rename DRLVM to Harmony VM?
> It feels to me like claiming DRLVM to be "the only" Harmony VM.
> On the contrary, I thought Harmony project is about *encouraging*
diversity.
>
> I think having library named libdrlvm.so would be much better.
>
The Harmony launcher looks for harmonyvm.dll as its default vm library.
It's just a generic
name so that the launcher can find the correct library without -vm. The
IBM VME also
contains a harmonyvm.dll, which is why it works without specifying
command line options
Regards,
Oliver
>
>> 2. Exclude building of the "original" launcher from the DRLVM build -
>> it currently conflicts with the classlib launcher (both are called
>> "java").
>>
>> 3. Aside from the hythread, it may also have a sense to make the
>> classlib and DRLVM using the same zlib dll/so (preferably the system
>> one).
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
Oliver Deakin
IBM United Kingdom Limited
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
