On 10/11/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/9/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/9/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the status of our discussions about new test suite layout?
> > Long ago we decided not to move existing tests until we finish with
> > that discussion but the discussion seems to be either dead or in coma
>
> It's not dead ;-) We are waiting for the completion of j.u.concurrent
> so that we could run a pilot and continue our discussion.
Looking forward to ...
btw, Harmony may also benifit from "failure and rerun" feature of TestNG. I
believe developers will like it!
Sure ;-)
>
> > Does it make sense to continue putting the tests in order (according to
> the old
> > model) and relayout them as soon as we finish the discussion?
>
> Yes, it does make sense. Before we draw any new conclusion about
> TestNG, I suggest we follow our existing testing
> conventions/guidelines.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Richard Liang
> China Development Lab, IBM
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
--
Richard Liang
China Development Lab, IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
