Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to that arcitecture). Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc. Example of JIRA could be: "[ipf][classlib][awt] natives build is broken"
Regards, Pavel. On 10/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was thinking about the recent IPF thread, and was going to add a "DRLVM-IPF" category so we can track things easier. But this is dumb - there are other things for porting, like stuff in classlib and the launcher tools (maybe). Anyway, how does "Port-<platform>" sound as a pattern? so in this case, "Port - IPF" geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
