Oh, sorry. I read this thread, it mentions the harmonyvm, the stability degradation in the last months so the first thought was about DRLVM and recent BBC affect :)
On 10/17/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mikhail, unfortunately derby test cannot run on drlvm. An assert fail exception will be thrown out. I have talked about it in another thread http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg15643.html and raised jira as 1836. On 10/17/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Leo, just a simple interest, could you try to run harmony with -Xem:opt, > -Xem:jet, -Xem:server, -Xem:server_static options? These are all modes > drlvm > supports today except the default one (-Xem:client) > > For example if the test passes with Jitrino.JET (-Xem:jet) and fails with > Jitrino.OPT (-Xem:opt) this is a good candidate for JIT bug > > On 10/17/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > The result of Derby is not so obvious, since its test is not junit > but > > some a serial of stand-alone java program calling each other. And the > > comparing result is a pre-stored data file. So I have to use sometime to > > set > > aside all the irrelevant code to spot those related with Harmony > classlib. > > What makes things worse is that as a product, all the exception has > > been > > caught... > > Is there someone who has good idea to pick up problem quickly in > this > > issue? > > > > > > On 10/17/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Are there any obvious bugs in Harmony that are of note? Perhaps some > > > unexpected NPEs? > > > > > > On 10/16/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, all: > > > > I have ran the tests of Derby on Harmony, both on windows xp > and > > > > ubuntu. The result is similar. > > > > > > > > On windows, > > > > 579 Tests Run > > > > 73% Pass (428 tests passed) > > > > 27% Fail (151 tests failed) > > > > 9 Suites skipped > > > > On linux, > > > > 579 Tests Run > > > > 74% Pass (430 tests passed) > > > > 26% Fail (149 tests failed) > > > > 9 Suites skipped > > > > > > > > The result seems a little frustrating since Sian had 82% passed > > > several > > > > months before. The version of derby I ran is at revision 464429. The > > > lost > > > > passing rate may be due to the modified code and added testcases. > > > > > > > > To Sian: I made a new patch in the attachment which is an > updated > > > > version of the patch Sian provides. I will be appreciate if Sian > helps > > > to > > > > check its validity and thus I will be assured that the lost passing > > rate > > > is > > > > irrelevant to our modification. > > > > > > > > When I can confirm everything is all right, I will then put the > > > ongoing > > > > progress result on Harmony's wiki page. > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Leo Li > > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Terms of use : > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Leo Li > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > > > -- > Mikhail Fursov > > -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
-- Mikhail Fursov
