But there really contains code about launcher in Harmony/luni, and this
part is maintained by Harmony classlib but not VM. :)
On 10/19/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/10/19, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It is quite a dilemma: VM is free to choose the strategy of loading
library
> while the sequence is related to classlib.
> In my opinion, it is classlib that has enough information and the
> responsibility to decide the library loading sequence.
> Since the launcher is in the control of classlib, is it possible that
after
> getting the JavaVM, manually load the required library then run the main
> method?
Nope, the launcher is not a part of classlib and will not present in
all configurations (e.g. browser plugin or direct use of Invocation
API).
IMHO #3 is too crooked therefore inacceptable, and indeed we have to
state a VMI contract for loading natives needed by classlib: #1, #4 or
some other. I may suggest:
5. Reuse "bootclasspath.properties" solution. That is, there is always
mandatory hyluni lib, which can set up some property value indicating
a list of required libraries - as it is done now for bootclasspath
jars. After loading hyluni and calling its JNI_OnLoad, VM can read
this list and load other libs.
NB. Currently DRLVM follows #1, that's why it works.
>
>
> On 10/18/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > > Can't we use lazy initialization here? I had similar experience with
> > > this class in the past, and think it should not be so fragile to
> > > initialization sequence. And definitely it should not affect whole
VM
> > > run.
> > Hmm...lazily loading for Msg class is good, but I'm afraid it's not
the
> > "sweet point" of this problem, because in this case, the exception is
> > *really* thrown by j.n.URL, so that you cannot avoid loading resource
> > bundle(btw, I just found that the full stacktrace hasn't been pasted
> > yet[1]). lI suspect the issue is that the hyarchive.dll/so has not
been
> > loaded yet when this exception happens, so I added this line to the
> > static initialization part of ZipFile
> >
> > static {
> > + System.loadLibrary("hyarchive"); //$NON-NLS-1$
> > ntvinit();
> > }
> >
> > The test codes pass happily. I want to commit this as work around if
no
> > one objects, but I still think a general solution for this kind of
issue
> > is necessary. There are several classes in archive module need native
> > library, Adler32, CRC32, Deflater, Inflater and ZipFile, only
explicitly
> > load hyarchive here cannot guarantee bug free, and some other modules
> > (nio, text etc) have same risk. I have some proposals:
> >
> > 1. Load classlib native libraries as early as possible in VM, as what
we
> > do for hyluni, this is safe but the concern is all the Harmony
> > compatible VM needs to do this, unacceptable.
> > 2. Load them early enough, like what we do now in IBM VME, the
hyarchive
> > is loaded during j.l.System static init, it was considered early
enough,
> > but sadly this case shows that we cannot image all cases, even for a
> > relative general case
> > 3. Create an init class like below, and all classes needs native
library
> > must load this init class at first, this works but works in ugly
way...
> > public class Init{
> > static{
> > System.loadLibrary("blabla");
> > }
> > }
> > public class SomeClassNeedsNative{
> > static{
> > Class.forName("Init"); // the class loading should only
> > happen once so that the native library is loaded only once.
> > }
> > }
> > 4. Produce some contract like Jar_OnLoad() which is described in
> > MANIFEST.MF, so that any class loader loading the jar at first time
will
> > execute that method, like JNI_OnLoad or so. This solution seems
general
> > and elegant, but needs yet another agreement between Harmony VM and
> > classlib, further it may make the jar not compatible with other VM.
> >
> > Comments? More ideas?
> >
> > [1] java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: java/util/zip/ZipFile.ntvinit()V
> > at java.util.zip.ZipFile.<clinit>(ZipFile.java:50)
> > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method)
> > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:177)
> > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:144)
> > at
> > com.ibm.oti.vm.AbstractClassLoader.fillCache(AbstractClassLoader.java
:95)
> > at
> > com.ibm.oti.vm.AbstractClassLoader.getResourceAsStream(
> > AbstractClassLoader.java:134)
> > at java.util.ResourceBundle$1.run(ResourceBundle.java:282)
> > at java.util.ResourceBundle$1.run(ResourceBundle.java:1)
> > at
> > java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:179)
> > at java.util.ResourceBundle.handleGetBundle(ResourceBundle.java
:277)
> > at java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundle(ResourceBundle.java:134)
> > at org.apache.harmony.luni.util.MsgHelp$1.run(MsgHelp.java:114)
> > at
> > java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:179)
> > at org.apache.harmony.luni.util.MsgHelp.setLocale(MsgHelp.java:112)
> > at org.apache.harmony.luni.util.Msg.<clinit>(Msg.java:49)
> > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method)
> > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:177)
> > at java.net.URL.<init>(URL.java:296)
> > at java.net.URL.<init>(URL.java:156)
> > at
> > org.apache.harmony.security.fortress.PolicyUtils.getPolicyURLs(
> > PolicyUtils.java:445)
> > at
> > org.apache.harmony.security.fortress.DefaultPolicy.refresh(
> > DefaultPolicy.java:278)
> > at
> > org.apache.harmony.security.fortress.DefaultPolicy.<init>(
> > DefaultPolicy.java:184)
> > at
> > org.apache.harmony.security.fortress.DefaultPolicy.<init>(
> > DefaultPolicy.java:173)
> > at java.lang.Class.newInstanceImpl(Native Method)
> > at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:1250)
> > at java.security.Policy$1.run(Policy.java:156)
> > at
> > java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:179)
> > at java.security.Policy.getDefaultProvider(Policy.java:151)
> > at java.security.Policy.getAccessiblePolicy(Policy.java:191)
> > at java.security.Policy.getPolicy(Policy.java:132)
> > at org.apache.harmony.luni.util.PriviAction.run(PriviAction.java
:133)
> > at
> > java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:179)
> > at java.lang.System.setSecurityManager(System.java:825)
> > at java.lang.System.installSecurityManager(System.java:155)
> > at java.lang.System.completeInitialization(System.java:117)
> > at java.lang.Thread.<init>(Thread.java:129)
> > >
> > > 2006/10/18, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> A little further hack shows that, the cause is o.a.h.luni.util.Msg
> > >> cannot be initialized so early, which is the exception message i18n
> > >> helper class. Its static init codes try to load ResourceBundle but
> > >> failed. The new i18n helper o.a.h.l.internal.nls.Messages has same
> > >> issue. I modified the java.net.URL ln.296 as below, and the test
> > passed.
> > >> - throw new MalformedURLException(
> > >> - org.apache.harmony.luni.util.Msg.getString
(
> > >> - "K00d8", spec)); //$NON-NLS-1$
> > >> + throw new MalformedURLException("exception message
> > >> here");
> > >>
> > >> Leo Li wrote:
> > >> > Hi, all:
> > >> > During the self-hosting of Derby, I found a security
policy if
> > is
> > >> > applied will lead to errors in loading the class of JarFile. IBM
vm
> > >> > will throw java/lang/UnsatisfiedLinkError:
java/util/zip/ZipFile.ntvi
> > >> > while
> > >> > drlvm will crash with "SEH handler: shutdown errorSEH handler:
too
> > >> many
> > >> > shutdown errors..."
> > >> >
> > >> > Here is the testcase:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > import java.util.jar.*;
> > >> > public class TestJarFile {
> > >> >
> > >> > public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{
> > >> > System.out.println(JarFile.CENATT);
> > >> > }
> > >> >
> > >> > }
> > >> >
> > >> > And the attachment is the derby_tests.policy.
> > >> >
> > >> > Then run:
> > >> >
> > >> > java -Djava.security.manager
> > >> > -Djava.security.policy=derby_tests.policyTestJarFile
> > >> >
> > >> > Run passes,
> > >> >
> > >> > Harmony on IBM VM fails with java/lang/UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> > >> > java/util/zip/ZipFile.ntvi
> > >> >
> > >> > Harmony on Drlvm fails with SEH handler: shutdown errorSEH
handler:
> > >> > too many
> > >> > shutdown errors
> > >> >
> > >> > If the security manager is not specified, Harmony passes.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Paulex Yang
> > >> China Software Development Lab
> > >> IBM
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paulex Yang
> > China Software Development Lab
> > IBM
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Leo Li
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM
