Alex,
I believe only committers can close an issue. Once an issue is
resolved, I usually leave a comment and ask the reporter to verify it
and then when that happens I close it. It's not uncommon that
verification just gets missed, so I just come back and close anything
that has been resolved for a month or longer.
-Nathan
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alex Blewitt (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 21, 2006 5:12 AM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-632) Patch to provide parsing of
file_bands at end of Pack200 file.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-632?page=comments#action_12444028
]
Alex Blewitt commented on HARMONY-632:
--------------------------------------
Sorry, what's the correct protocol for these situations? Do I need to
comment that all is OK and then close it, or can you only close it?
Patch to provide parsing of file_bands at end of Pack200 file.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HARMONY-632
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-632
Project: Harmony
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Classlib
Reporter: Alex Blewitt
Assigned To: Nathan Beyer
Priority: Trivial
Attachments: segment.patch
This patch provides the unpacking of the file_bands at the end of a Pack200
archive. With this, the implementation is now capable of reading a non-GZipped
pack200 archive and being able to correctly extract the file names and bytes.
Currently, the parsing does no processing in terms of being able to
reconstitute those into files.
Owing to a Java limitation in byte array initialisation, the maximum size of a
file must be <2Gb in this current implementation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
