Good idea Mikhail! I think I will base on it in my future solution.
I see only one negative side for it. Quantity of the treads increased by one in normal situation. Any ideas? Thanks. Pavel Afremov. On 10/25/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The "Work Balance Subsystem" task is to start new finalizing threads when all active threads are busy, isn't it? The solution could be: 1) Add +1 thread: "finalizers manager" 2) notify this thread (as Salikh proposed) to start finalization and do the "Work Balance Subsystem" job. Does it work or am I missing something? On 10/25/06, Pavel Afremov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. It couldn't. I don't now any solution which can do it. > > Pavel Afremov. > > > On 10/25/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/25/06, Pavel Afremov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Your fix just switch off Finalization Work Balance Subsystem > > > > > > Pavel, could Work Balance Subsystem be implemented in finilizers threads > > directly. That is we will not have Java code executed from helpers? > > > > -- > > Mikhail Fursov > > > > > > -- Mikhail Fursov
