On 10/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a nice note to wake up to...


Vladimir Strigun wrote:
> Here are the results:
>
> Small workload:
>     OrigBuild    Fixed    Sun1.5.0_06
> bloat    996,078    1024,85    955,589
> chart    1240,777    1068,112    953,096
> fop    250,433    232,957    174,901
> hsqldb    348,942    361,139    540,45
> jython    831,143    824,775    571,292
> lusearch    1854,95    1870,969    1830,589
> luindex    339,45    231,314    441,79
> pmd    29,704    23,638    61,638
>
> Average    449,91    408,60    471,71
>
> default workload:
>     OrigBuild    Fixed    Sun1.5.0_06
> bloat    16116,691    15618    13578,522
> chart    11701,546    10036,631    9790,247
> fop    2539,386    2502,518    2387,289
> hsqldb    3217,338    3078,331    5709,291
> jython    14639,278    14064,104    9456,167
> lusearch    14508,938    16175,085    13663,679
> luindex    16292,652    15501,713    15602,178
> pmd    10840,264    12937,255    9734,032
>
> Average    9337,73    9281,87    8787,42
>
> large workload:
>     OrigBuild    Fixed    Sun1.5.0_06
> bloat    168733,5    175493,46 138468,277
> chart    31651,79    25681,751    25599,38
> fop    2546,289    2512,045    2412,487
> hsqldb    22873,608    13555,515    15751,873
> jython    128207,3    92863,28    26183,716
> lusearch    29425,991    30064,153    26605,631
> luindex    17825,795    18083,898    14307,71
> pmd    44548,724    40225,694    46345,995
>
> Average    31345,21    27334,72    22348,3525
>
> At first glace the results are pretty good, but antlr benchmark works
> incorrectly with DRLVM (Harmony-1906) and there are no results for
> eclipse and xalan benchmarks. I'm still working on Dacapo analysis.


"Pretty good"?  You're suggesting that DRLVM is faster than Sun 1.5.  I
would say "Wow!", not "pretty good..."

More info - what is "OrigBuild" and what is "Fixed"?  Why is "Fixed"
slower than "OrigBuild"?

"Fixed" is the same build plus H-1980 included. As you can see from
"average" rows "Fixed" build is faster. The values are in millisec, so
the less the better, i.e. we are still slower that RI.

Thanks,
Vladimir.

geir

>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir.
>
> On 10/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 10%-15%?  That's amazing.  How fast are we (DRLVM) compared to Sun 1.5
>> using decapo?
>>
>> geir
>>
>>
>> Vladimir Strigun wrote:
>> > The optimization covers the following issues:
>> > - java.nio.charset.CharsetDecoder and java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder
>> > Streaming decoding/encoding was removed. Analysis of API hotspots for
>> > Dacapo shows that CharsetDecoder is frequently used almost in all
>> > benchmark, especially in chart. We already discussed advantages of
>> > streaming decoding but the fix shows significant performance
>> > improvement on average for all Dacapo benchmarks. For instance, boost
>> > for chart benchmark is about 16%. Paulex, you recently worked in
>> > nio_char module and if I correctly remember you introduce streaming
>> > operations, so could you please review the changes and let me know?
>> > Since streaming operation was removed, tests have been slightly
>> > modified as well (previous version of tests fails on RI).
>> > - java.io.BufferedReader
>> > readLine() method was slightly modified. Additional check whether some
>> > characters available in cached buffer was added prior to main cycle.
>> > - java.io.InputStreamReader
>> > Cached char buffer was removed, read() , read(char[], int, int)
>> > methods were rewritten. Current implementation of read(char[], int,
>> > int) uses several invocation of System.arraycopy. Proposed solution
>> > wraps char[] arguments within char buffer and therefore doesn't use
>> > arraycopy. Decoding operation is also produced inside the method, so
>> > fillBuf() has been removed
>> >
>> > Thoughts? Comments?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Vladimir.
>> >
>> > On 10/26/06, Vladimir Strigun (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> [classlib][performance] performance improvement for luni and nio_char
>> >> modules
>> >>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>                 Key: HARMONY-1980
>> >>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1980
>> >>             Project: Harmony
>> >>          Issue Type: Improvement
>> >>          Components: Classlib
>> >>            Reporter: Vladimir Strigun
>> >>         Attachments: Harmony-1980.diff
>> >>
>> >> I've analyzed API frequently used in all Dacapo[1] benchmarks and
>> >> found several places in luni and nio_char modules that can be
>> >> improved. Suggested fix gives about 10-15% boost on average for Dacapo
>> >> executed on DRLVM. I'll post more details to dev list.
>> >> Attached fix contains modifications for the following classes:
>> >> java.io.BufferedReader, java.io.InputStreamReader,
>> >> java.nio.charset.CharsetDecoder and java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.
>> >>
>> >> Please have a look to the results of Dacapo execution (values are in
>> >> millisec, so the less the better):
>> >>
>> >> Small workload
>> >>
>> >>        OrigBuild   Patched
>> >> bloat   996,078 1024,85
>> >> chart   1240,777        1068,112
>> >> fop     250,433 232,957
>> >> hsqldb  348,942 361,139
>> >> jython  831,143 824,775
>> >> lusearch        1854,95 1870,969
>> >> luindex 339,45  231,314
>> >> pmd     29,704  23,638
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> default workload
>> >>        OrigBuild   Patched
>> >> bloat   168733,562      175493,467
>> >> chart   31651,792       25681,751
>> >> fop     2546,289        2512,045
>> >> hsqldb  22873,608       13555,515
>> >> jython  128207,303      92863,28
>> >> lusearch        29425,991       30064,153
>> >> luindex 17825,795       18083,898
>> >> pmd     44548,724       40225,694
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://dacapobench.sourceforge.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> >> -
>> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>> >> administrators:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>> >> -
>> >> For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to