I'll take care of 1975.

SY, Alexey

2006/11/2, Oleg Khaschansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1. Silently doing nothing if invalid parameters are passed seems to
me a right behavior in this case.

Will someone apply changes to GapContent from the harmony-1975.patch
or we need to make a separate patch for this?

On 11/2/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/11/2, Ivanov, Alexey A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've started fixing HARMONY-1809. To remove throws clause from the
> > declaration of replace method, as it was proposed by Oleg in
> > HARMONY-1975, I placed removeItems() and insertItems() calls into
> > try-catch block. This would work OK for any valid arguments.
> >
> > I was going to handle invalid arguments by making adjustments so that
> > the following removeItems() and insertItems() will not throw the
> > exception. After I wrote several tests, I faced strange behaviour of RI
> > with regards to invalid arguments to replace.
> >
> > (The Javadoc say nothing about which valid ranges for replace()
> > parameters as well as any exceptions.)
> >
> > RI accepts invalid arguments but the result differs from what I'd
> > expect.
> > For example, if the content has "text" in it, I'd expect that
> > content.replace(-2, 4, null, 0) would give "xt" as the result. I mean
> > the invalid start position is adjusted to 0, and the length of remove is
> > adjusted to be 2 accordingly. But this is not the case. As the result of
> > this call, all characters are removed leaving "" in the content.
> >
> > Moreover the content object becomes unusable after that:
> > content.insertString(0, "1") throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.
> >
> > Similarly if number of characters to be removed is greater than the
> > length of the content (content.replace(2, 4, null, 0) with "text" in
> > it), the object will throw ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when doing
> > insertString.
> >
> >
> > Considering the fact that GapContent is pretty low-level class in text
> > representation model and that it is protected, I think that Harmony
> > implementation can silently ignore BadLocationException possible thrown
> > from insertItems() and removeItems(). Taking into account erroneous
> > behaviour of RI's replace, we can do that until an application is
> > broken.
> +1 for this solution.
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> > As another option, we can throw an Error from catch block to make
> > application which depends on implementation of replace() fast-fail.
> >
> >
> > Any objections, comments, opinions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alexey.
> >
> >
> > P.S. The related JIRA issues:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1809
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1975
> >
> > GapContent Javadoc:
> > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/swing/text/GapContent.html
> > Description of GapContent.replace:
> > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/swing/text/GapContent.html
> > #replace(int,%20int,%20java.lang.Object,%20int)
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexey A. Ivanov
> > Intel Middleware Product Division
> >
>

Reply via email to