On 11/5/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
first, can we also use this test for gcv4.1? Second, shouldn't you test now to make sure that all is well? It will be much harder to figure out later...
Rana, Xiao Feng, Please test. I am not building GCv5 right now. geir
weldon washburn (JIRA) wrote: > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1993?page=all ] > > weldon washburn closed HARMONY-1993. > ------------------------------------ > > Resolution: Fixed > > committed. since it is only local to gc_gen directory and this directory is not part of regular build, no testing was conducted > >> A stress test for young generational allocation that measures allocation rate >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: HARMONY-1993 >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1993 >> Project: Harmony >> Issue Type: Improvement >> Components: DRLVM >> Reporter: Rana Dasgupta >> Assigned To: weldon washburn >> Priority: Minor >> Attachments: gc_genbuild, gentest >> >> >> These two patches are for adding a stress like test to gc_gen that creates and discards a large number of young objects repeatedly on an increasing number of threads. The test focuses on gen0 and allocation rate. The gentest patch needs to be applied to the gc_gen directory >> The gc_genbuild are the build modifications to gc_gen >> We may want to hold off committing till the list agress on where these focussed component tests that run for a while and don't return a pass/fail should live. >> Tested on 32 bit Linux ( RHEL ) and XP >
-- Weldon Washburn Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
