Yes, I think the discussion on class unloading is one the successful examples of open community in coming up with a good design and making design decision. Although the final design can be one person's proposal, but it's based on or enlightened by all the participants' opinions. Eitenne's proposal is a big stride over the original one.
Cheers, xiaofeng On 11/8/06, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's worth a lot, since you have implemented this in SableVM yourself. Thanks. On 11/7/06, Etienne Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For what it's worth, I'll add my humble +1. > > Etienne > > Xiao-Feng Li wrote: > > Agreed, so plus me. > > > > Thanks, > > xiaofeng > > > > On 11/8/06, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On 11/7/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > All, > >> > > >> > It looks like the debate on class unloading has concluded. > >> > > >> > Let's vote on implementing Robin's proposal. > >> > > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > Weldon > >> > > >> > PS -- When class unloading gets implemented and committed is a > seperate > >> > issue. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > +1 I think it's the best proposal among those that were discuussed > >> > >> > > > > -- > Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ > SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ > SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ > > >
