The all we have is the single HARMONY-2073 JIRA that is currently unassigned. I am going to create the new thread with [drlvm] in subject to attract more DRLVM fans to this.
Regards, 2006/11/9, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
That's fine. Do we know what the problems are in DRLVM for those tests in debug? I don't recall seeing any discussion here... geir Alexei Zakharov wrote: > Eventually we get more and more arguments to start doing test grouping > somehow. TestNG, JUnit TestSuites or whatever but be we definitely > need it. And sooner is better. > > Regards, > > 2006/11/9, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> Alexei Zakharov wrote: >> > Let me rephrase my question a little bit. What should we do in this >> > particular case when some test passes on J9 and HDK (DRLVM with >> > BUILD_CFG=release) and fails/crashes on DRLVM with BUILD_CFG=debug? I >> > have two examples of such tests already. >> >> 1) Fix DRLVM. >> >> 2) conditionally not execute that test when running DRLVM so that it >> completes. >> >> But we don't want to comment out tests in the code, just not run them >> for certain environments. >> >> geir >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > 2006/11/9, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Stepan, Tim, >> >> >> >> Well, I am not sure here. All tests passes both on J9 and DLRVM Relase >> >> build (HDK is a RELEASE build is far as I understand). But it crashes >> >> on DRLVM DEBUG - this makes our drlvm guys a bit nervous. As far as I >> >> understand the reason is too complex to be fixed promptly. Probably >> >> the solution I have chosen is not the best one. So I am open for >> >> proposals here. Should we exclude the whole test? In my opinion DRLVM >> >> is not just "another_VM" - it is something we should care about. IMHO. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> 2006/11/8, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > Stepan Mishura wrote: >> >> > > Hi Alexei, >> >> > > >> >> > > Sorry, I don't understand your logic. Is the test case valid? If >> >> there was >> >> > > another bug (for example: "[another_VM][unit] half of classlib >> >> beans tests >> >> > > crashes VM"), would you agree to comment out a half of beans >> tests? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks Stepan, I had also intended to point out this commit. I >> agree >> >> > that it is masking a problem elsewhere which should be fixed, and >> I'd >> >> > also point out that commenting out test code is not the preferred >> >> way to >> >> > exclude a test since it will be very difficult to find the excluded >> >> test >> >> > and include it again. We have been using the build scripts to >> exclude >> >> > test classes.
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
