Hello, Could we please make the license for Haskore BSD rather than GPL? Almost all Haskell libraries these days use BSD, and I find that it is much simpler to deal with. -Iavor
On 7/30/08, Paul Hudak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Lato wrote: >> Is this an invitation for input from the community? If so, my >> comments follow. If not, it would be best to stop reading here... >> > > Input is always welcome! > >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Paul Hudak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> It might make sense to break up Haskore into a couple of different >>> packages, as I believe Stefan Kersten suggested. I will have to think >>> more about that. It might also make sense to release a couple of >>> standard wrapper modules that set up typical use cases of Haskore. >>> >> >> I personally favor separate packages because I think it's easier to >> maintain smaller packages for multiple platforms, especially where >> those packages interface with non-Haskell libraries or are other prone >> to difficulties during installation. If that's not likely to be an >> issue for the next major Haskore, I have no problems with 1 package. >> > > Ok, we will take that into consideration. > > Thanks, -Paul > > _______________________________________________ haskell-art mailing list haskell-art@lists.lurk.org http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-art
