Re: Show, Eq not necessary for Num [Was: Revamping the numeric classes]

[Brian Boutel]

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:


> I'm against removing Eq from the numeric hierarchy, against making Num
> instances for functions, but I would probably remove Show. I haven't
> seen a sensible proposal of a replacement of the whole hierarchy.
> 

Then we probably are in agreement. 

--brian

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe