> I realize this is a topic where it would be very easy to start a flame > war, but hopefully we can avoid that. No problem :-) > Maybe I did not express my point clearly. What I was trying to say was > that > because of the syntax, it is very easy for M-C-q in Emacs to convert > that to ... Ok, I understand now. So clearly we just need better editing tools for Haskell, which I guess is part of your point. By the way, there are many Haskell programmers who prefer to write their programs like this: let { a = x ; b = y ; c = z } in ... which arguably has its merits. -Paul _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
- RE: Functional programming in Python brk
- RE: Functional programming in Python Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Functional programming in Python Ketil Malde
- RE: Functional programming in Python brk
- Re: Functional programming in Python Pertti Kellomäki
- Re: Functional programming in Python Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Functional programming in Python Kellomaki Pertti
- Re: Functional programming in Python Arjan van IJzendoorn
- Re: Functional programming in Python Paul Hudak
- Re: Functional programming in Python Kellomaki Pertti
- RE: Functional programming in Python Paul Hudak
- RE: Functional programming in Python brk
- Re: Functional programming in Python Dean Herington
- Re: Functional programming in Python Peter Hancock
- Re: Functional programming in Python Peter Hancock
- RE: Functional programming in Python Peter Douglass
- RE: Functional programming in Python Tom Pledger
- RE: Functional programming in Python S. Alexander Jacobson
- RE: Functional programming in Python Malcolm Wallace
- Re: Functional programming in Python Zhanyong Wan
- Re: Functional programming in Python S. Alexander Jacobson