On 22-Nov-2001, Keith Wansbrough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am just curious: Why does Haskell not provide exceptions a la SML? > > Why does only the IO monad allow for exceptions? > > GHC certainly implements exceptions, along the lines described in > > A semantics for imprecise exceptions, Simon Peyton Jones, Alastair > Reid, Tony Hoare, Simon Marlow, Fergus Henderson. Proc Programming > Languages Design and Implementation (PLDI'99), Atlanta.
... and the main reason why Haskell 98 didn't incorporate this is because, well, 98 was before 99 ;-). In other words, it wasn't well understood at the time the Haskell report was being written. But I think exception support along the lines suggested in that paper and implemented in GHC is very likely to be included in the next revision of Haskell. That's my opinion, anyway, though of course I am somewhat biased on this issue! ;-) -- Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "I have always known that the pursuit The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit" WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
