At 17:27 26/08/03 +0200, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
My Haskell experiments have reached a size in which debugging tools would be
more than welcome, so I looked around, and was very disappointed. I tried
Hood, which is a pain to use (lots of editing of the code required), I looked
at Buddha but didn't want to downgrade to GHC 5 for trying it (nor is my code
Haskell 98, because of multi-parameter classes), and all that seems left to
try is Hat, whose Web site I can't reach at the moment.

So what are you Haskell programmers using for debugging in real life?

I have found that an approach based on unit testing (using HUnit) eliminates most requirements for a debugger. When I have problems, I resort to ad-hoc techniques, sometimes exposing (exporting) the inner workings of a module for testing/exploration purposes.


#g


------------ Graham Klyne _________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___|_o_o_o_|_� \____________/ (nb Helva) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @Reading, River Thames http://www.ninebynine.org/Travels/2003Aug-Thames/Intro.html

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to