> I wonder whether keeping the names of data constructors in info tables
> is expensive?
>
> I would have guessed not. (more debugging info such as
> function names and src locations is likely to be more
> expensive however).
>
> Anyway, would it be possible/feasible for GHC to keep names
> in info tables
> all the time, not just for profiling? At least for data-constructors?
That's a distinct possibility. If you send patches we'll incorporate
them.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
