Peter Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Keith Wansbrough writes:
>> Count me as a vote for the better-but-slightly-slower wc. > How about the attached program? On my machine it faster than > Tomasz's version, and I think it's still a fairly clean > source code I guess it's possible to submit three different Haskell entries (for GHC, Hugs and NHC). Perhaps we should split up, and aim for performance with GHC, memory with NHC and clarity/brevity with Hugs? (Seriously, it would be very instructive to look at the differences between the three versions.) -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
