Peter Achten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>>But it uses explicit strictness annotations a lot, and provides strict
>>and/or unboxed versions of various fundamental types (e.g. tuples),
>>with some implicit coercions.
>
> It is of course not the language that uses strictness annotations.

But the language encourages to use them much more often than in
Haskell. They can be declared in types, there is a short syntax for
"strict let", and various builtin types have strict variants. These
are properties of the language.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to