On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 10:10:44PM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > Remi Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do you mean "subset" with "subsequence"? > > No, since a set isn't ordered. > > I would say a subset needs to contain some of the elements of the > superset, a subsequence needs to contain some elements of the > supersequence in the same order, and a substring (for lack of a better > term) is a contigous subsequence. > > But I may be wrong.
Agreeing on terminology is always nice :D at least http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsequence seems to agree with you. In which case both Peter Stranney's and my solutions fail. Groetjes, Remi -- Nobody can be exactly like me. Even I have trouble doing it. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
