At 01:19 17/10/04 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> 2. Try revisiting the original problem and thinking about how to
> solve it in a Haskellish way, rather than solving it in another
> language and then translating.
Thats exactly what I'm trying to do here :-) I've thought of having a
type that basically stores a bunch of functions -- an implementation
would simply provide an instance of that type with the functions,
maybe.
That's what I've typically ended up doing in my code.
#g
------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
